<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Virtual Globe Bloat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/</link>
	<description>Genealogy Software Tutorials for Mac &#38; PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Sayer</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting Joe. It helped me see the point of the virtual globe from your perspective.

----Ben
&gt;@&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting Joe. It helped me see the point of the virtual globe from your perspective.</p>
<p>&#8212;-Ben<br />
>@<</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>I agree with the above post above regarding where the globe is headed. I don&#039;t see the point --yet-- but do look forward to the possibility of a point.

As for MFT, I think it&#039;s great. I used to run a windows based machine and am now on a MAC. I&#039;ve tried the Master Genealogist and Reunion, PAF and Family Tree Maker. I like MFT because it&#039;s simple and I can add as much or as little info as I please.

Most genealogy software is build for &quot;serious&quot; genealogists. The folks who think they&#039;ve traced their ancestors to days or yore before there were records to prove their claims. Such &quot;serious&quot; genealogy lack the &quot;fun&quot; aspect which is what I want when sharing what amounts to family stories best told by the fireside.

I like proof and sources to complement my research but too much of what is genealogy seems to get bogged down in census records and hard to parse ged com files. When I show my sister or family a kekule number or family group sheet they yawn. When I show them that 3D chart of our family and they grasp the sheer size of our family in just a few generations they look in awe and start to take an interest. I see the virtual globe as another part of this sharing experience.

Now, there are a log of problems with MFT yet every time I&#039;ve emailed them a suggestion they email back and get on the issue. I can&#039;t even get ancestry.com or family tree maker people to respond to an email. That makes a world of difference in my book. I think MFT offers an awesome alternative in the way that google offers an alternative to your library&#039;s card catalog. Some search functions and imput devices just work better for some people. That and back on point -- some features are just cool and fun to play from time to time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the above post above regarding where the globe is headed. I don&#8217;t see the point &#8211;yet&#8211; but do look forward to the possibility of a point.</p>
<p>As for MFT, I think it&#8217;s great. I used to run a windows based machine and am now on a MAC. I&#8217;ve tried the Master Genealogist and Reunion, PAF and Family Tree Maker. I like MFT because it&#8217;s simple and I can add as much or as little info as I please.</p>
<p>Most genealogy software is build for &#8220;serious&#8221; genealogists. The folks who think they&#8217;ve traced their ancestors to days or yore before there were records to prove their claims. Such &#8220;serious&#8221; genealogy lack the &#8220;fun&#8221; aspect which is what I want when sharing what amounts to family stories best told by the fireside.</p>
<p>I like proof and sources to complement my research but too much of what is genealogy seems to get bogged down in census records and hard to parse ged com files. When I show my sister or family a kekule number or family group sheet they yawn. When I show them that 3D chart of our family and they grasp the sheer size of our family in just a few generations they look in awe and start to take an interest. I see the virtual globe as another part of this sharing experience.</p>
<p>Now, there are a log of problems with MFT yet every time I&#8217;ve emailed them a suggestion they email back and get on the issue. I can&#8217;t even get ancestry.com or family tree maker people to respond to an email. That makes a world of difference in my book. I think MFT offers an awesome alternative in the way that google offers an alternative to your library&#8217;s card catalog. Some search functions and imput devices just work better for some people. That and back on point &#8212; some features are just cool and fun to play from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Moffat</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Moffat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Pat if you&#039;re used to PAF, I think you&#039;ll be quite happy with Reunion.

Reunion lags behind some of the Windows softwares as noted above, but I think has all the features you&#039;re used to with PAF at least, and probably a few more, and it&#039;s a great, well made Macintosh programme.

And perhaps one of its greatest features is the community at http://ReunionTalk.com/ where users and the Leister Productions start will answer your questions - sometimes within minutes of posting them.

There is a trial of Reunion you can get if you haven&#039;t found that already.

http://www.leisterpro.com/doc/demo/demo.php

Cheers

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat if you&#8217;re used to PAF, I think you&#8217;ll be quite happy with Reunion.</p>
<p>Reunion lags behind some of the Windows softwares as noted above, but I think has all the features you&#8217;re used to with PAF at least, and probably a few more, and it&#8217;s a great, well made Macintosh programme.</p>
<p>And perhaps one of its greatest features is the community at <a href="http://ReunionTalk.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ReunionTalk.com/</a> where users and the Leister Productions start will answer your questions &#8211; sometimes within minutes of posting them.</p>
<p>There is a trial of Reunion you can get if you haven&#8217;t found that already.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.leisterpro.com/doc/demo/demo.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.leisterpro.com/doc/demo/demo.php</a></p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Clark</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>I am so glad to read these comments.  Last year I took the plunge to MAC and I don&#039;t regret that in the least.  However, my extensive genealogy information on PAF has required me to hold on to my old Windows computer.

I quickly purchased MFT, but that was surely a disappointment.  It was all graphics without the functionality.  I tried very hard to like it and took all the upgrades including the globe mapping tool which I find utterly useless.  Meanwhile simple navigation is a nightmare and I just don&#039;t trust it to keep all my data.

I was considering getting a new Windows computer for just the genealogy because bootcamp would cost more and be a pain.  But I decided to try to find a better software.  I am really leaning to purchase Reunion as I don&#039;t require all the fancy GUI bells and whistles like floating fake family bodies.

Please tell me this is the right path!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad to read these comments.  Last year I took the plunge to MAC and I don&#8217;t regret that in the least.  However, my extensive genealogy information on PAF has required me to hold on to my old Windows computer.</p>
<p>I quickly purchased MFT, but that was surely a disappointment.  It was all graphics without the functionality.  I tried very hard to like it and took all the upgrades including the globe mapping tool which I find utterly useless.  Meanwhile simple navigation is a nightmare and I just don&#8217;t trust it to keep all my data.</p>
<p>I was considering getting a new Windows computer for just the genealogy because bootcamp would cost more and be a pain.  But I decided to try to find a better software.  I am really leaning to purchase Reunion as I don&#8217;t require all the fancy GUI bells and whistles like floating fake family bodies.</p>
<p>Please tell me this is the right path!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Burrow</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Burrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Andy and Roger.  A picture is worth a thousand words.  I have not used MFT but have been exploring similar activities using Google mapping tools.  It would be so much more efficient to have it within my genealogy program, Reunion.  Mapping a few of our ancestor&#039;s life events can give us lots of clues as to where to look next, how to fill out their story and a perspective on their life journey.  Lots of good info.  Try it you&#039;ll like it!!!  - pb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Andy and Roger.  A picture is worth a thousand words.  I have not used MFT but have been exploring similar activities using Google mapping tools.  It would be so much more efficient to have it within my genealogy program, Reunion.  Mapping a few of our ancestor&#8217;s life events can give us lots of clues as to where to look next, how to fill out their story and a perspective on their life journey.  Lots of good info.  Try it you&#8217;ll like it!!!  &#8211; pb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell Egilson</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1097</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell Egilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1097</guid>
		<description>I am curious about locations.  Even when reading a book I often look up mentioned locations on the Atlas.  I had not used the Virtual Globe until I saw this discussion.  I have put in some co-ordinates and find it somewhat interesting.  Really it is a bit of a gimmick and I doubt  that its accuracy makes it much competition to a good set of maps. I really enjoy good maps - and have lots of them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about locations.  Even when reading a book I often look up mentioned locations on the Atlas.  I had not used the Virtual Globe until I saw this discussion.  I have put in some co-ordinates and find it somewhat interesting.  Really it is a bit of a gimmick and I doubt  that its accuracy makes it much competition to a good set of maps. I really enjoy good maps &#8211; and have lots of them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Moffat</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Moffat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>The map is useful because it&#039;s a map - a visual aid - of where my ancestor was during his life. If I see a list of places

Blackerstone, Longformacus, Berwickshire, Scotland
Renton Cottage, Coldingham, Berwickshire, Scotland
Greenwood, Coldingham, Berwickshire, Scotland
Dovecot Hall, Cockburnspath, Berwickshire, Scotland

I&#039;m clueless about where they are (even though I&#039;ve been to these places personally), and so have absolutely no concept of how far apart they are, how far did this person travel between places of his life events (let alone that his life starts and ends on completely opposite sides of the globe).

If you look at William&#039;s father&#039;s page

http://roger.lisaandroger.com/getperson.php?personID=I32&amp;tree=Roger

you can see the wanderings of this man in the early 1800s as he was born (although I don&#039;t know exactly where hence the green pin, married, and had 8 children, appeared in a Census and then died. The orange and red pins are exact locations - farms usually - while the green and yellow indicate a County and a Parish.

This is information that you&#039;d never get from a list, unless you had the map of the entire world memorised.

As I said I can&#039;t wait until Reunion allows me to do this - as well as being able to keep notes and media items linked up to the place, rather than having to put this information into the record of each person who was at that place.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The map is useful because it&#8217;s a map &#8211; a visual aid &#8211; of where my ancestor was during his life. If I see a list of places</p>
<p>Blackerstone, Longformacus, Berwickshire, Scotland<br />
Renton Cottage, Coldingham, Berwickshire, Scotland<br />
Greenwood, Coldingham, Berwickshire, Scotland<br />
Dovecot Hall, Cockburnspath, Berwickshire, Scotland</p>
<p>I&#8217;m clueless about where they are (even though I&#8217;ve been to these places personally), and so have absolutely no concept of how far apart they are, how far did this person travel between places of his life events (let alone that his life starts and ends on completely opposite sides of the globe).</p>
<p>If you look at William&#8217;s father&#8217;s page</p>
<p><a href="http://roger.lisaandroger.com/getperson.php?personID=I32&#038;tree=Roger" rel="nofollow">http://roger.lisaandroger.com/getperson.php?personID=I32&#038;tree=Roger</a></p>
<p>you can see the wanderings of this man in the early 1800s as he was born (although I don&#8217;t know exactly where hence the green pin, married, and had 8 children, appeared in a Census and then died. The orange and red pins are exact locations &#8211; farms usually &#8211; while the green and yellow indicate a County and a Parish.</p>
<p>This is information that you&#8217;d never get from a list, unless you had the map of the entire world memorised.</p>
<p>As I said I can&#8217;t wait until Reunion allows me to do this &#8211; as well as being able to keep notes and media items linked up to the place, rather than having to put this information into the record of each person who was at that place.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Sayer</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Hi, Dennis.

I appreciate your opinion on the matter and thanks for sharing it.

It reminded me to clarify a position: I think there&#039;s great value in MacFamilyTree. Competition makes the whole field better. The folks at Synium innovate which also improves the state of genealogy software on the Mac. That&#039;s one of the purposes I set for myself when I started this blog. My article was intended to point out what, in my opinion, is wasted effort so that the software can be improved.

—Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Dennis.</p>
<p>I appreciate your opinion on the matter and thanks for sharing it.</p>
<p>It reminded me to clarify a position: I think there&#8217;s great value in MacFamilyTree. Competition makes the whole field better. The folks at Synium innovate which also improves the state of genealogy software on the Mac. That&#8217;s one of the purposes I set for myself when I started this blog. My article was intended to point out what, in my opinion, is wasted effort so that the software can be improved.</p>
<p>—Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Sayer</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Hi, Roger.

Thanks for adding your thoughts. I&#039;m curious about how the map is useful to you.

—Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Roger.</p>
<p>Thanks for adding your thoughts. I&#8217;m curious about how the map is useful to you.</p>
<p>—Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Moffat</title>
		<link>http://genealogytools.com/is-the-virtual-globe-bloat/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Moffat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macgenealogist.com/?p=2808#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t use MacFamily Tree, so aren&#039;t exactly sure what the virtual globe does, but I&#039;m more than a little anxious for Reunion to adopt some kind of mapping with Google maps that would let me make the map I see here http://roger.lisaandroger.com/getperson.php?personID=I16&amp;tree=Roger from within Reunion and then transfer it to TNG. If you zoom in on Scotland you can see the pins separate to show the various locations Willliam was born, counted in 2 censuses and married. That&#039;s pretty useful to me - quite apart from being quite interesting.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use MacFamily Tree, so aren&#8217;t exactly sure what the virtual globe does, but I&#8217;m more than a little anxious for Reunion to adopt some kind of mapping with Google maps that would let me make the map I see here <a href="http://roger.lisaandroger.com/getperson.php?personID=I16&#038;tree=Roger" rel="nofollow">http://roger.lisaandroger.com/getperson.php?personID=I16&#038;tree=Roger</a> from within Reunion and then transfer it to TNG. If you zoom in on Scotland you can see the pins separate to show the various locations Willliam was born, counted in 2 censuses and married. That&#8217;s pretty useful to me &#8211; quite apart from being quite interesting.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

